Broadcasting a Conference Online with Livestream.com
Last week, I spent most of my week in final preparation for and then running the live broadcast of the SIOP Leading Edge Consortium 2012 on Environmental Sustainability at Work in New Orleans. This was a bit experimental – SIOP had never done this before, nor had I. But the LEC leadership team wanted to increase the reach of the conference to those that would otherwise be unable to participate. This effort was apropos given the topic of the conference; by serving virtual attendees, we reduced the carbon footprint of the conference while simultaneously increasing its message. I learned a great many lessons in putting this together, which I thought I would share for those facing similar challenges.
Costs and Equipment
The LEC committee decided early on that we would stream exclusively to remote hosts, not to individuals’ computers. This was done to provide some control over the participant experience – at each remote location, a local facilitator would manage the traditional flow of conference activities, including lunch, breaks, etc. This was also beneficial cost-wise because we had over 100 virtual participants but only about a dozen local sites; most streaming sites (Livestream included) set pricing tiers in part based upon the number of anticipated viewers. With 12 remote sites, 3 observation/testing sites, and about 8.5 hours of video (+20% for testing and unanticipated overhead), we only needed 153 viewer hours, well within the lowest price tier for Livestream ($350 at the time; we set up this premium account a couple of weeks ahead of the conference so that the month of access we’d gain would overlap the conference sufficiently to allow time to test pre-conference and to download archived footage post-conference).
Because we wanted to shoot in HD, we also needed to purchase equipment: a Logitech HD Pro Webcam C920 and a Vanguard VS-82 Table Top Tripod. I chose the C920 because it has an on-camera codec (decreases processor load when broadcasting video in real time) and the VS-82 because I needed to pan/tilt smoothly without a full tripod but also needed it to fit in my messenger bag with my laptop. I am happy to report that both worked great.
That brought the total technology cost for Livestreaming our conference to about $450.
As for other equipment, I already had other necessary items – a laptop, a cooling pad (important), and ear-cup headphones (i.e. noise canceling, or at least designed such that external noises are very muffled while wearing them). If you don’t have these items, this would obviously cost you a bit more.
Since we were working with remote sites, we needed to invite those sites well ahead of the conference. My only advice here is that if you plan to involve remote sites, work with them well in advance. As the person tapped to organize a virtual conference, you are probably checking your e-mail continuously. Remote site facilitators are much less likely to share your enthusiasm. Even a single request for information could take a couple of weeks to be fulfilled. Critically, we also needed local copies of the presenters’ PowerPoint presentations to broadcast them in maximum quality – the last presentation was delivered less than an hour before that presentation began.
The evening before the conference, I set up my equipment in the conference room as seen in the diagram above. First, I set up the broadcasting laptop and cooling pad connected to the webcam and tripod. Because webcams don’t have optical zoom, you’ll need to be within 10-15 feet (3-4 meters) of the speaker in order to get a fair amount of detail (this generally means the first row of seats/tables). Next, I ran three cables – power to the wall, Ethernet (I would not trust wireless Internet access for a live broadcast) to the wall, and an audio cable to the room’s stereo mix out (i.e. whatever the room hears on the audio system should be fed into your computer’s microphone/line-in port). This will mean some conversion; typically, the room is on a microphone cable (called XLR) whereas your computer will need a 3.5mm mini-stereo plug. Such converters are generally cheap, but you’ll need to have them (or, as in our case, you’ll need to get them from the local AV folks). Finally, I plugged in my headphones.
Questions from Virtual Sites
You might have noticed an unaccounted-for netbook in the diagram above. This was because we wanted to take questions from the audience at the virtual sites. We did so with Twitter (using a hashtag) and via e-mail. A group of graduate students in my lab back at ODU were standing by monitoring these sources and feeding me the questions via Google Talk, which was open on the netbook (which was connected via wi-fi). A second team relaying questions is strongly recommended. Not only do they filter questions for you, but they also can monitor feed quality. You probably won’t have enough time to keep track of questions from multiple sources while also keeping the camera aimed, so this team keeps the multitasking pressure lower. I also kept a live feed open on the netbook so that I could watch for fluctuations in feed quality and skips.
If you’re using Livestream.com, I’d recommend the Procaster software which can be downloaded for free from Livestream. This allows you to switch between “screen” view (a capture of a portion of your screen – I used this to record a local copy of the presenter’s PowerPoint), “camera” view (the live camera feed), and various mixed feeds combining the two. I recommend the “3D Mix” which records a small portion of the camera view (enough to capture the presenter) plus a larger version of the screen view (so that the PowerPoint appears large and crisp). To increase professionalism, I also recommend switching feeds such that the people watching can’t see you transition between PowerPoints. For example, between presentations, I would switch to “camera” view to focus on the presenter while behind-the-scenes I would swap out the PowerPoints before returning to 3D Mix.
The only problem with this setup is video – since your audio is coming from the room, if any presenters use embedded video in their PowerPoints, you’ll need to switch to screen mode and pivot the camera to look at the projection screen or the audio won’t sync. The only way to avoid this is to get a live feed from the presenter’s computer and then re-broadcast that (usually not possible). You may also need to modify the camera’s video settings manually when changing from a speaker (generally fairly dark) to a projected image (extremely bright). Logitech’s built-in camera tools accomplish this nicely, which you can run in tandem with Procaster.
What to Broadcast When Not Broadcasting
I would strongly recommend creating an “on a break” PowerPoint slide and recording a short loop of video containing this slide (maybe 30 seconds). Then, using Livestream Studio, cue this on autopilot. This way, any time the feed cuts out, viewers will automatically be redirected to the an official-looking pause slide. There is also an “automatically add to auto-pilot” option in Procaster that you probably don’t want to turn on – otherwise, everything you record automatically re-appears in the live feed.
Once the hardware is set up, there’s a multi-step process to get Procaster running appropriately:
- Open the preferences and go through every menu. Every single item on here is potentially important, so take your time and think about every one (this is how I noticed the “automatically add to auto-pilot” option). I’d recommend hiding the mouse from the live feed.
- Select a recording quality that is appropriate given your computer and anticipated Internet connection. I’d recommend against using any of the quality presets, because your laptop probably can’t handle them – you’ll want as much processor power devoted to a single high quality stream as possible. Set your audio quality to at least 160kbps and the video quality pretty high (I used 1000 kbps) and test it (see if you can keep the processor usage consistently under 50% or so while swinging the camera around and playing music). Adjust up and down and test again until you can get it in the right area.
- Open all the PowerPoints you’ll need before opening Procaster.
- Open Procaster and click “Go Live”.
- Open any camera setting programs and set as appropriate (if using the recommend webcam above, I recommend turning off auto-focus and going to “full landscape”, and also turning off auto-gain/auto-exposure after the camera initially adjusts to the light level of the room).
- Drag the capture rectangle over PowerPoint.
- Open the audio mixer and enable the headphone monitor (so that you can listen to your stream). Adjust audio feeds until the mix sounds good. Close the audio mixer unless you’ll have multiple speakers.
- Monitor the feed to ensure the camera stays targeted and keep the headphones on to ensure the audio sounds right.
Even if you set up everything correctly, you’ll be doing a lot of multi-tasking – monitoring the video feed, listening to the audio feed, relaying questions, aiming the camera, mixing the audio, and adjusting camera quality. Anything you can do to delegate responsibility, do that.
Working closely with the on-site AV people is critical. They control the quality of sound output in the room, and by extension, the quality of sound in your feed. If they manage levels appropriately, you won’t need to adjust the mixer mid-presentation (one less thing to worry about). Nice AV people will also provide all your converters (we ended up needing some special equipment – a mixer – to get from the room’s stereo mix back to my computer – you can see it in the photo at the top of this page).
Livestreaming is processor intensive. I’d originally planned to broadcast in full HD (1080p; blu-ray quality), but this spiked my processor usage to 100% and my computer simply could not keep up without dropping frames and audio cut-outs. If you’re using a laptop, even with a fast processor, you probably can’t get above DVD quality in a live feed while keeping your processor at a reasonable level (<50%). Although not super-crisp, this still looked decent according to reports at remote sites (the biggest concern was that the slide text was not blurry on a projected screen). With a sufficiently powerful desktop and a proper cooling system, you can do better – but it seems unlikely most conference organizers would want to set up a desktop computer at a conference site (especially in a multi-room configuration).
One of things that surprised me the most was psychological: speakers don’t really know who to look at when a virtual participant asks a question. Usually, they just stared at me, as if they were trying to convince me personally of their response to the point that I had relayed. That’s neither good nor bad, but it might be a little unnerving if you don’t expect it.
Running a virtual conference is a big task with many working parts. It is easy to get overwhelmed. But if you carefully map out all the tasks involved and the requirements for those tasks, it’s quite doable, even with a small budget. With these guidelines and a little work, you should be able to take any in-person conference and add a virtual audience.
|Previous Post:||Why Do People Play Online Social Games?|
|Next Post:||Behavioral Antecedents of Participation in Social Mentoring Networks|