<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Employers Ruin Surveys For the Rest of Us</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neoacademic.com/2010/09/02/some-employers-ruin-surveys-for-the-rest-of-us/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neoacademic.com/2010/09/02/some-employers-ruin-surveys-for-the-rest-of-us/</link>
	<description>technology, education and training research from an industrial/organizational (I/O) psychologist in the ivory tower</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: George A Guajardo</title>
		<link>http://neoacademic.com/2010/09/02/some-employers-ruin-surveys-for-the-rest-of-us/#comment-2761</link>
		<dc:creator>George A Guajardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoacademic.com/?p=928#comment-2761</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This issue is pretty common for survey research. More sensitive research topics required more clever techniques to confront the confidentially issue. 

In the research lab we use social desirability scales. While they didn&#039;t eliminate respondent tendencies to self-sensor, they did allow us to estimate (and correct) how afraid people were to respond accurately. The idea here is that some people will self-sensor or self-aggrandize more than other people.

This technique could be used for large-scale surveys within organizations, but I have found that corporate clients are not enthusiastic about the idea. In fact, clients seem to be very suspicious of statistical correction techniques of any kind (in my experience), so they have only one weapon left to make sure survey data is not influenced by distrust. They must be trustworthy.

If employees trust their employers, survey data will be less distorted.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This issue is pretty common for survey research. More sensitive research topics required more clever techniques to confront the confidentially issue. </p>
<p>In the research lab we use social desirability scales. While they didn&#8217;t eliminate respondent tendencies to self-sensor, they did allow us to estimate (and correct) how afraid people were to respond accurately. The idea here is that some people will self-sensor or self-aggrandize more than other people.</p>
<p>This technique could be used for large-scale surveys within organizations, but I have found that corporate clients are not enthusiastic about the idea. In fact, clients seem to be very suspicious of statistical correction techniques of any kind (in my experience), so they have only one weapon left to make sure survey data is not influenced by distrust. They must be trustworthy.</p>
<p>If employees trust their employers, survey data will be less distorted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
