<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Inappropriate Work-related Facebook Checkups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neoacademic.com/2009/11/30/inappropriate-work-related-facebook-checkups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neoacademic.com/2009/11/30/inappropriate-work-related-facebook-checkups/</link>
	<description>technology, education and training research from an industrial/organizational (I/O) psychologist in the ivory tower</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawna</title>
		<link>http://neoacademic.com/2009/11/30/inappropriate-work-related-facebook-checkups/#comment-545</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:19:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoacademic.com/?p=484#comment-545</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[(Also, it&#039;s kind of awesome that you are literally an expert on this subject, no?)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(Also, it&#8217;s kind of awesome that you are literally an expert on this subject, no?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawna</title>
		<link>http://neoacademic.com/2009/11/30/inappropriate-work-related-facebook-checkups/#comment-544</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoacademic.com/?p=484#comment-544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like your conclusions. Very reasonable. 

My own beef with this practice of checking up on people is that previous generations of folks regarded as dependable, conscientious workers have had probably comparable -- but invisible -- partying habits. Having no standards by which to judge the habits of &quot;normal&quot; successful workers gives us no reliable basis of comparison. At the moment, therefore, any judgment rendered from this evidence is more cherry-picking and guess-work than anything.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like your conclusions. Very reasonable. </p>
<p>My own beef with this practice of checking up on people is that previous generations of folks regarded as dependable, conscientious workers have had probably comparable &#8212; but invisible &#8212; partying habits. Having no standards by which to judge the habits of &#8220;normal&#8221; successful workers gives us no reliable basis of comparison. At the moment, therefore, any judgment rendered from this evidence is more cherry-picking and guess-work than anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
