<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GRE: The Personality Test</title>
	<atom:link href="http://neoacademic.com/2009/07/09/gre-the-personality-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://neoacademic.com/2009/07/09/gre-the-personality-test/</link>
	<description>technology, education and training research from an industrial/organizational (I/O) psychologist in the ivory tower</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 May 2013 15:02:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard N. Landers</title>
		<link>http://neoacademic.com/2009/07/09/gre-the-personality-test/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard N. Landers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:48:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoacademic.com/?p=326#comment-129</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ah, that&#039;s right!  I didn&#039;t catch that before.  But that really just makes it a standardized recommendation rating form, doesn&#039;t it?  So if a school already uses a standardized rating form (many did, when I applied), what is the motivation to adopt this instead?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah, that&#8217;s right!  I didn&#8217;t catch that before.  But that really just makes it a standardized recommendation rating form, doesn&#8217;t it?  So if a school already uses a standardized rating form (many did, when I applied), what is the motivation to adopt this instead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kuncel</title>
		<link>http://neoacademic.com/2009/07/09/gre-the-personality-test/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Kuncel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 20:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://neoacademic.com/?p=326#comment-128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An important clarification.  The PPI is not a self report measure so faking is not an issue.  It is a measure that would be used in conjunction with letters of recommendation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An important clarification.  The PPI is not a self report measure so faking is not an issue.  It is a measure that would be used in conjunction with letters of recommendation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
